Type of contracts
Denmark will buy at least part of the CERs resulting from each of
the projects it supports. Denmark will offer market-based prices (check
for example Point Carbon for reference prices for CERs in forward
contracts), taking into account the risk distribution and delivery
conditions. Denmark offers a standard ERPA, in which Denmark will
buy a large share (say 75-80%) of the expected CER generation until
2012, with an option to buy more for the same price. Denmark may also
provide other ERPA formats, provided these are acceptable to the Chinese
authorities.
Third-party costs
Another important advantage of using the Danish facility is that
it will pay for third-party costs: not only does the Facility provide
support for the development of the PDD, it will also pay for validation,
initial and periodic verification, and registration.
Transparency
Often a lot of time is lost in negotiating the legal documents relating
to CDM. We will try to avoid that: we will publish our standard
forms of legal documents (in English, but with an unofficial translation
into Chinese), so that the Project Owner can review it before submitting
a project to the facility. These standard forms will indicate certain
parts that we will need to negotiate between square brackets. After
reviewing, we will request the project owner submits together with
the PIN comments on the standard legal documents, indicating with
which articles and clause the project owner does not agree. That
will help us to assess whether negotiations are likely to take a
lot of time and costs, and if they do, we will avoid these projects,
which is in the interest of both Denmark and the project owner.
If we select the project, negotiations
will be based on the standard forms and the comments from the project
owner. So if the project owner indicates, for example, that it considers
a certain Article inappropriate, or that another Article should
be added, we will address that in the later negotiations.
|